|
bert
Guest
|
 |
« on: March 18, 2006, 06:35:24 am » |
|
Do you offer the winamp_api plugin for the beta version too?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
R1CH
Administrator
Member
Posts: 2625
|
|
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2006, 04:21:14 pm » |
|
I'd prefer to wait for 0.9 API to finalize before I update the winamp emulator for it. Looking at the beta page I also see the following: An SDK will be released to the public after foobar2000 v0.9 goes final. This is to simplify bugfixing by ensuring that the bugs and issues people report are all related to / caused by foobar2000 and its official components themselves and not unexpected behaviour of third party components. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
patrol
Guest
|
|
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2006, 10:37:14 am » |
|
how about hXXp://wXw.foobar2000.org/SDK.zip  [live links  ] it's a SDK for Foobar 0.9  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
derb
Guest
|
|
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2006, 01:22:48 pm » |
|
Yea please update it. I used it and loved it, would be great for 0.9 to work too. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
R1CH
Administrator
Member
Posts: 2625
|
|
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2006, 01:54:41 pm » |
|
Wait a week or so, apparently 0.9 will be final by then  . |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
R1CH
Administrator
Member
Posts: 2625
|
|
« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2006, 03:03:59 pm » |
|
Ok maybe not. Working on it now . |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
R1CH
Administrator
Member
Posts: 2625
|
|
« Reply #6 on: March 20, 2006, 12:14:04 am » |
|
Hmm, I'm not liking the lack of documentation and examples for the 0.9 SDK.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mojomonkee
Guest
|
|
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2006, 01:56:22 am » |
|
Any updates on the progress of the .9 update R1CH? Is the only roadblock the fact that the SDK is so poorly documented?
SH/SC is pulling for you. Well, I am at least and I like to think that counts for something.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
R1CH
Administrator
Member
Posts: 2625
|
|
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2006, 02:18:41 am » |
|
Well I'm not really too keen on 0.9 itself, it seems like a step backwards. That, and not really knowing C++ is a bit of a problem considering the new SDK is almost foreign to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
dred111
Guest
|
|
« Reply #9 on: March 21, 2006, 03:13:30 am » |
|
Yoyr plugin it's great, great job I'm waiting for compatibility to 0.9 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
pete north
Guest
|
|
« Reply #10 on: March 22, 2006, 03:05:09 pm » |
|
i'm also highly anticipating this plugin w/ compatibility for the new .9 releasage.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tom
Guest
|
|
« Reply #11 on: March 25, 2006, 11:33:28 am » |
|
hope youre getting forward. i really miss that plugin.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
R1CH
Administrator
Member
Posts: 2625
|
|
« Reply #12 on: March 25, 2006, 02:22:13 pm » |
|
I'll try and work on it today.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bconnolly
Guest
|
|
« Reply #13 on: March 25, 2006, 02:25:49 pm » |
|
Thanks a lot man. I think I speak for the entire alternate shell community (most notably Litestep) when I say that we can't live without this component. It's one of the most useful plugins to us who need the Winamp API to make Litestep modules work.
Thanks a lot for your work man. It's not going unnoticed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
R1CH
Administrator
Member
Posts: 2625
|
|
« Reply #14 on: March 25, 2006, 07:39:47 pm » |
|
Almost done . |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Author